No go theory
So it seems I shouldn’t be on the roads with my lack of hazard perception. After failing that rather poorly yesterday I think I need to be more aware on the roads…22 out of 75 - woops! The whole section of the theory confused me though. Thought I was clicking too much (apparantly not). Actual theory of the roads was much better though, 33 out of 35 (motorway rules and documents where the 2 wrong). Never mind, eh - I mean, it’s only 20 quid…
Posted on December 15th, 2004 at 6:31 pm. About 'No go theory'.
hazard perceptions a crap measure of how gd a driver u r anyway - and u didn’t even know what to expect. screw it!
Posted on December 15th, 2004 at 7:07 pm. About 'No go theory'.
you having fun there, rachel? he he. and i totally agree with you about theories. they suck. ok well the multiple choice questions are alright. but the hazard perception is pointless - totally unlike when ure driving. arent u gonna be tested on that neway when ure driving? *shrugs*
Posted on December 15th, 2004 at 10:02 pm. About 'No go theory'.
driving is baaaaaaad! unhealthy! and you are polluting our fine world. get a bike!
Posted on December 16th, 2004 at 12:23 pm. About 'No go theory'.
driving is gooooood when you live so god damn far away from where you wanna go. stupid public transport i have to depend on at the mo, which sucks big time too.
Posted on March 24th, 2005 at 7:13 pm. About 'No go theory'.
woah- so long ago since i posted this. well finally passed (ok so it was like the middle of february but forgotten i’d said something on here). one less on my multi-choice this time, 32. but slight improvement to 51 on my hazard perception so don’t mind so bad lol. woo!
Posted on June 11th, 2005 at 9:40 pm. About 'No go theory'.
ok - small chance… but chris if you ever look at this again driving is not bad - its very very good. and i’m not ‘polluting our fine world’ because i give people lifts to places when they would otherwise get sepeartae taxis. so there!
bleh
~rach~